Right to Die for Terminal Illness Essay Example for Free

Right to Die for Terminal Illness EssayHistoric eithery, the Greeks and Romans were tolerant of assisted suicide. If no relief could be submitd to ease the pang of a dying person, it was bankable for that person to request athletic supporter to end their suffering (Voluntary, 1). If you look through come in the world today, there argon only three countries whose g e trulywherenments expect initiated policies level-headedizing the rightfield for their terminally gravely citizens to request voluntary euthanasia, those countries being Switzerland, Belgium, and the Netherlands (Euthanasia, 1). In the United States, there are only three states that pick up successfully passed similar legislation giving a person this right. surgery in 1997 and Washington and Montana in 2009 passed into law an assisted suicide law for the terminally ill (Frequently). As supreme ruler for the month, I would adopt Oregons Death with haughtiness chip on a federal level and take it a step jus t by legalizing euthanasia under extreme circumstance for the terminally ill. We live in a country where abortion, whether you like it or not, is legal. If we as a society allow pregnancies to be aborted, then why wouldnt it be acceptable to legalize a persons excerpt to request assisted suicide from a terminally ill disorder?Just for clarification, I do not believe in or rationalize suicide. It is in the extreme circumstances of a terminally ill disease where all other resources harbour been exhausted that I find this as a vial alternative. I am not an advise for abortion either. The unborn are not given a choice only if it is legally dear for the time being. With assisted suicide for the terminally ill, they at least can be given the choice to end their personal suffering on their own terms. I therefore, under these circumstances, find assisted suicide (euthanasia) more humane and legally acceptable due to the precedence set by abortion.The program that I would pass into law would be very similar to the Death with Dignity Act currently utilize by the State of Oregon. In this Act, a competent tolerant, 18 and older, diagnosed with a terminally ill disease with less than six months to live with no livelihood-saving alternative available may request their mendelevium to provide them with a lethal dosage of narcotics for self-administration (Frequently). The patient leave be evaluated by a second physician and a psychological exam is performed if necessary to legitimize the request (Frequently).If the person is found to be of unspoiled mind and it is determined all checkup avenues ave been exhausted, the patient will be granted access to the life ending medication. The patient at any time retains to the right to withdraw the request (Frequently). If the patients physician finds this morally objective, they retain the right to remove themselves from the case but cannot inhibit the request if all criteria have been met (Voluntary, 3). In this case, a new physician will be assigned to the case to grapple the life ending treatment. As a second part of this Act, a Medical Power of lawyer (MPA) euthanasia clause will be exercised to expedite the closing process at the request of the patient.In the advanced stages of death, unmatchable who has accepted their fate but is no longer competent, if granted through the MPA by the patient and absence of personal gain by the MPA, this clause will be included in the Act to administer life ending medication or euthanize the patient by the physician at the request of the MPA. In lieu of further hospice treatment or as part of, such as morphine, the MPA may exercise their right to request life-ending drugs be administered to the patient. I see this as an extension of the DNR.In cases where a patient has been removed from any medical treatment and death is imminent, hours or days, per multiple physicians prognosis, and the patient is more or less unresponsive, the MPA may exercise the euthana sia clause in lieu of further pain treatment or medical induced coma. Again, in the case where the physician finds this act immoral, they have no obligation to comply but if all the criteria have been met at the patients documented request, the physician will be required to remove themselves from the case and an alternate physician be assigned to see out the request.A patients request for assisted suicide or MPA euthanasia must be documented and recorded through the hospital system and with the local authorities (Frequently). This request can be included in the patients living will, DNR request, or on a separate legal document. The documentation process of the requestor must be witnessed by two or more persons with only one witness being of blood relation (Frequently). A full psychological evaluation of the patient may be performed by the hospital or legal authority to ensure the requestor is of sound mind when the documents are executed (Frequently).The legal authorities must also be notified when a requestor will be exercise their right to assisted suicide before any life ending medication can be administered or released to the patient. According to ELDR Magazine, a study released in May 2008 reports these death with dignity laws are gaining subject momentum (Elder, 1). This study goes on to explain many of the respondents would choose to be placed in medical coma even if it were to quicken the death process and even more would choose to be interpreted off life support measure if they were in a vegetative state (Elder,1).It also states that over 80% of respondents felt the right to die is a personal decision and not one to be controlled by the government or religion (Elder, 1). This being the case, by implementing a federal Die with Dignity Act, it would grant people the freedom to die in a manner that reflects their personal choice, and the physicians who administer these requests would not be subject to legal ramifications. On a personal note, in the cu ltivation two years, I have lost my father to cancer and my grandfather to a fatal stroke, both of whom I was very close with.I was the main caretaker for my father over his last six months and watched over him through a lot of painful times, especially towards the end. I often wonder if there were laws that allowed the freedom of choice towards expediting the death process, would my father have exercised this right? Its hard to lose a loved one but its also hard to watch them experience such great suffering. You emotionally suffer right along with them. When my time comes, will I want my children to feel helpless? To suffer along with me to the last breath? Or will I be able to grant them the power to ease my suffering and theirs?