Keystone Pipeline Issue on U.S. Economic and Environmental Annotated Bibliography

linchpin ancestry Issue on U.S. Economic and Environmental perspectives - Annotated Bibliography ExampleAccording to Blakey, the Keystone XL pipeline polarizes parties from each side of the construction conflict. The term states that, in a typical enmity between liberals and traditionalists, both parties incline a deeper disadvantage in their argument. If ecologists believe oil is not worth the jobs creation, then liberals will determine profit to be the prime key to the United States energy security (Blakey 335).Blanchard and Jacobson provide an ecological perception reflecting the provided carbon-concentration of tar-sands creation. Even though conservatives believe that that operation of the Alberta tar sands would merely come to a stop, necessity for hydrocarbon-based energy is extremely high. In addition, the diary says that the Ogallala aquifer is acutely sensitive, but its vulnerability is more valuable than the possible damage to British Columbias rain forest. The l ast leading problem discussed in the journal is the likelihood of the construction of the Northern Gateway. The Northern Gateway may be a fallback approaching for the ecologists (Blanchard and Jacobson 2011).Daugherty states that the president destroyed tens of thousands of employment opportunities when he denied Keystone the opportunity to build the Keystone XL pipeline. many another(prenominal) of the jobs would have been provided in Houston, Texas. Further than that, the governments decision to halt the pipeline is considered complete irrational. The article says that the Obama administration is illogic from an economic perspective. This is because of an overpowering goal of national security supposed to reduce the rural areas reliance on foreign energy sources (Daugherty 2012).Hargreaves says that the Obama administration refused an offer to develop the contentious Keystone oil sands pipeline. The article says that the government defended its choice by saying that the deadlin e enforced by the intercourse did not leave adequate time to carry out the essential review. The pipeline might not be